[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Class E addresses in the wild
- Subject: Class E addresses in the wild
- From: george.herbert at gmail.com (George Herbert)
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:19:38 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAD6AjGSgeyM_j0oTiMyBzv=YqENS_x9BQywAdjKbH+h---3SaA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CACFrepZNAVm_Gfm0LnR7KhOPLFbCkeNTEZgKHEz5pOJp8r05oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACFrepb0ADKh6vzuP9QE3m5vskj4gwBp3gkZm47qrLLap12gWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGB2cxD+i=WuAvMaZag2JQJkqJD8PAkB5b94mE4HHNong@mail.gmail.com> <CAK__KztcK3B-OvBsGpv2mb7eA-0vmkus-fK39J=NP0Na+D+-4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSgeyM_j0oTiMyBzv=YqENS_x9BQywAdjKbH+h---3SaA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, cb.list6 <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am pretty sure Class E is completely defunct and not used anywhere
> since Cisco and Juniper routers do not forward the packets (circa 2008
> testing) and no known host accept it as a valid address, AFAIK.
Both the net and host sides of this are trivially repairable problems,
even for crazy cellphone network operators. As long as you have host
source code and a network vendor you can demand custom patches
from....
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com