[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- Subject: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:53:00 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAEmG1=rKLHe+2RKNt47A8X9W4GQRN8-tYV1CgCnRjF54z9jAfw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVL8f4K9kGSJiSnLbM5SNX7f0Ltt9=W3WKadkQ9qkUdgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=rKLHe+2RKNt47A8X9W4GQRN8-tYV1CgCnRjF54z9jAfw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> To ask the CEOs to authorize cutting off access to a competitor's web
>> site with the full support and approval of a group of recognized
>> Internet luminaries?
>
> Once you've had a polite and cheerful discussion about
> the feasibility of some set of companies in the public
> space banding together to restrict access to a subset
> of their competitors with your legal staff, we can
> go back to discussing how best to configure our
> routers.
This has already been tested vis a vis the anti-spam RBLs. There are
no new concepts here to challenge a court.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004