[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- Subject: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:40:55 +1100
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:14:47 EDT." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVL8f4K9kGSJiSnLbM5SNX7f0Ltt9=W3WKadkQ9qkUdgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=rKLHe+2RKNt47A8X9W4GQRN8-tYV1CgCnRjF54z9jAfw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In message <8277.1364350487 at turing-police.cc.vt.edu>, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu w
rites:
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:01:25 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> >
> > If you are with a ISP that does not practice BCP 38 are you willing
> > to risk your neck that you won't be subject to a "aiding and abetting"
> > charge? All of us here know that spoofing address like this is a
> > criminal activity.
>
> So what you're saying is that every single person who ran the spoofing
> program to help the SAIL guys gather data is a criminal?
See my response to Jay. I did not present this as a absolute.
Surveying which connections are open to address spoofing may or may
not be a criminal activity. It all depends on intent of the person
gathering the data.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org