[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- Subject: BCP38 - Internet Death Penalty
- From: jcurran at arin.net (John Curran)
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:05:38 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> The problem here is, of course, one of externalities and the Common Good,
> hard sales to make in a business environment.
"Common Good" situations are readily dealt with, but generally not on a
voluntary basis. You establish how the resource is to be managed, and
then you put in place mechanisms to deal with enforcement. The problem
is that en-force-ment contains "force", which is something that we really
don't want anyone (or set of anyones) using except "governments" (which in
our social constructs are the only ones supposed to be telling one party
under penalty of force not to do something otherwise in its best interest.)
The problem, of course, with asking governments for help is that the output
often does not resemble anything related to the original problem statement
and can make the situation worse...
If you setup an economic system where folks do the right thing because
it is in their own interest, that's one option that doesn't involve
government, but we know that is hard to do on technical grounds alone...
A group of commercial entities that work together to setup a system
which strongly encourages others to follow particular practices does
indeed need to worry about Matt Petach's list of statutes, and exercise
extreme care in its processes less the result be more about some form of
market control and less about common good management. Net result is that
management of a common good without some form of government involvement
quickly gets quite challenging.
If we had truly global operational best practices for the Internet (ones
that went through a fairly well-defined policy development process which
included multiple operator forums from around the globe) then you might
have a solid chance of producing output which avoided the various anti-
competitive aspects, and yet were a reasonable basis for governments to
then step up and indicate should be required for ISPs in their operations.
It wouldn't take very many governments asking "How do I reduce SPAM and
DDoS attacks?" and hearing back "Please require ISPs to adhere to this
Best Common Operating Practice Foo-01" before it became common practice.
FYI,
/John