[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DNS Reliability

Subject: DNS Reliability
From: ggm at algebras.org (George Michaelson)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:36:10 +1000
In-reply-to: <m2d2odfyvl.wl%[email protected]>
References: <CAPhg-wQDwJKeXS437bQon3mbVaDKW0YQitKTMNrB0_UheYzk2Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2ob7xg1ub.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAKr6gn25o8XTdTbDTL65ZED+=P1NR848vaGXFv=o5LNUg_vgVg@mail.gmail.com> <m2d2odfyvl.wl%[email protected]>

you removed a clause in that sentence randy:

"we're already outside our operating envelope, if these community
expectation figures are believable"

there is a point to that clause. its the same as your answer in some
respects.

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > we're already outside our operating envelope
>
> not really.  just some folk seem not to understand things such as udp
> datagrams and the dns protocols.
>
> randy
>

References:
- DNS Reliability
  - From: philfagan at gmail.com (Phil Fagan)
- DNS Reliability
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- DNS Reliability
  - From: george.herbert at gmail.com (George William Herbert)
- DNS Reliability
  - From: ggm at algebras.org (George Michaelson)
- DNS Reliability
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: DNS Reliability
Next by Date: DNS Reliability
Previous by thread: DNS Reliability
Next by thread: DNS Reliability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread