[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
common method to count traffic volume on IX
- Subject: common method to count traffic volume on IX
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:51:53 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJx5YvE9yEY0gF0=XN1k=iOFKjfZd5OJYHcOfAYkRk8UUpW2VQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJx5YvF-vL2k4tLRZ5ZcD_BYgr-pXF7f619qSdhpFAFiRtuJ=g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJx5YvE9yEY0gF0=XN1k=iOFKjfZd5OJYHcOfAYkRk8UUpW2VQ@mail.gmail.com>
In a message written on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:11:23PM +0300, Martin T wrote:
> counting traffic on inter-switch links is kind of cheating, isn't it?
> I mean if "input bytes" and "output bytes" on all the ports facing the
> IX members are already counted, then counting traffic on links between
> the switches in fabric will count some of the traffic multiple times.
Sounds like a marketing opportunity.
customer--s1--s2--s3--s4--s5--s6--s7--s8--s9--s10--customer
Presto, highest volume IX!
Maybe I should patent that idea.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130917/7a7839b4/attachment-0001.bin>