[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet
- Subject: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric Internet
- From: jmamodio at gmail.com (Jorge Amodio)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:04:54 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
LOL, we'll move the taps one layer down ...
-J
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> -----
>
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700
> From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
> To: liberationtech <liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu>
> Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Brazil Looks to Break from U.S.-Centric
> Internet
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
> Reply-To: liberationtech <liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2013, at 8:28 AM, David Johnson <David.Johnson at aljazeera.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Interesting ... but is this even possible?
> >
> http://world.time.com/2013/09/18/brazil-looks-to-break-from-u-s-centric-internet/
>
> Well, there are a bunch of different concepts being discussed. The
> primary one is localization of routing, which isn't just possible, it's
> best-practice, and something Brazil has been doing an excellent job of
> already for quite a few years. If you look at
> https://pch.net/applications/ixpdir/summary/ you'll see that they've got
> 23 active exchanges, which puts them second in the world after the U.S.,
> with 77% annualized growth, compared to 10% in the U.S. If you look at the
> Brazil section of https://pch.net/ixpdir you'll see that almost all of
> that growth has been occurring since they made it an explicit policy goal
> in 2008, and began aggressively implementing IXP best-practices.
>
> At a governance level, Brazil is divided. The CGI, which decides and
> implements domestic Internet policy, is the agency responsible for all this
> growth and best-practices-following. As such, they've been largely aligned
> with OECD-country and Internet interests. The Brazilian federal
> government, on the other hand, sets foreign policy, interacts with the ITU,
> et cetera. And so although it has no appreciable influence over what
> happens _within_ the country, it's what's seen by other national
> governments in diplomatic circles. In Internet governance, Brazil tends
> toward this Brazil-India-South Africa axis, which doesn't particularly
> align with the Internet or OECD countries, unless by accident. This is the
> area that Internet folks are most worried about, since those three
> countries are second-tier thought-leaders in the ITU, and can swing a lot
> of developing-country votes in their respective regions. So Brazil is, in
> many ways, the U.S.' opposite: they do the right thing domestically, but
> say the wrong thing internationally.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated:
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
> Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
> companys at stanford.edu.
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> --
> Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
> AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5
>