[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

minimum IPv6 announcement size

Subject: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <m2k3i6nlpv.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAYzVeH-Vf9nie5Qtj9gEbFA6UH3C+Mez8aF12kmLmgsMKU10w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote:

> doing multi-homing and having a /48 in each site would be very big waste 
> of IP resources.

IPv6 was designed with an expectation of having /48 per geographical site 
and this is perfectly fine.

I have a /48 at home.

What is more of a concern is to do aggregation in the DFZ, if every size 
got itself a /48 PI and announced it in the DFZ then the routing system 
would not be very happy...

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

References:
- minimum IPv6 announcement size
  - From: nccariaga at stluke.com.ph (Nathanael C. Cariaga)
- minimum IPv6 announcement size
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- minimum IPv6 announcement size
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- minimum IPv6 announcement size
  - From: bryan at serverstack.com (Bryan Socha)
- minimum IPv6 announcement size
  - From: nccariaga at stluke.com.ph (Nathanael C. Cariaga)

Prev by Date: minimum IPv6 announcement size
Next by Date: minimum IPv6 announcement size
Previous by thread: minimum IPv6 announcement size
Next by thread: minimum IPv6 announcement size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread