minimum IPv6 announcement size

[mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Måns Nilsson)]

Subject: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Date: Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:00:44AM -1000 Quoting Randy Bush (randy at psg.com):
> > I am running a network that is operating on multiple sites and
> > currently rolling out our IPv6 on the perimeter level.  Having to
> > get our /48 allocation from our RIR
> 
> excuse, but which rir handed out a /48 under which policy?

Any of them?

% Information related to '2001:67c:d8::/48'

inet6num:       2001:67c:d8::/48
netname:        SR-V6
descr:          Sveriges Radio AB
country:        SE
org:            ORG-SR18-RIPE
admin-c:        MN1334-RIPE
admin-c:        LEW3-RIPE
tech-c:         MN1334-RIPE
tech-c:         LEW3-RIPE
status:         ASSIGNED PI
mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
mnt-lower:      RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
mnt-by:         SR-MNT
mnt-routes:     SR-MNT
mnt-domains:    SR-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered



-- 
M?ns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Now, let's SEND OUT for QUICHE!!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130925/d14ca9db/attachment.bin>