[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SIP on FTTH systems

Subject: SIP on FTTH systems
From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:41:42 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Anders L?winger wrote:

> Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to 
> the access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other 
> direcly, all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?

Yes, what's the problem with that?

> (same as has been seen with proxy-arp in such networks)

Local-proxy-arp, yes.

> I think I need to do some experiments here...

I'd venture to say that any IPv6 implementation that doesn't support this 
is broken and should be fixed by the implementor.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

Follow-Ups:
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: anders at abundo.se (Anders Löwinger)

References:
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: anders at abundo.se (Anders Löwinger)
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- SIP on FTTH systems
  - From: anders at abundo.se (Anders Löwinger)

Prev by Date: Reliable Dedicated/VPS providers in Canada?
Next by Date: Operators and the IETF
Previous by thread: SIP on FTTH systems
Next by thread: SIP on FTTH systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread