10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation

[mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)]

On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 09:45:50 PM excelsio at gmx.com 
wrote:

> That?s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time
> ago. Why not take a current TOR switch with 1. BGP
> support and 2. high buffer. Like mentioned above we have
> Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation) has its
> HP 5930 series but tells "Routing table size 16000
> entries (IPv4), 8000 entries (IPv6)", but this one has
> 4GB RAM, so plenty of space for full tables. I haven?t
> tried it out myself, perhaps someone tried on any other
> device: What will happen, if I give the switch a full
> table? Is there a software limit by the vendor, which
> will simply cut everything above? Or would it simply
> work?

The 4GB RAM is control plane memory.

The problem is FIB memory, since switches generally forward 
Layer 2 and Layer 3 traffic in hardware, and this relies on 
forwarding entries being recorded into the FIB.

The 16,000 IPv4 entries or 8,000 IPv6 entries is because of 
limited FIB memory.

It's, typically, a switch limitation.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140108/6b1b47ba/attachment.bin>