[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- Subject: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- From: mukom.tamon at gmail.com (Mukom Akong T.)
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:07:59 +0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAHDzDLA=O9f7si6VZiZyr=B+HShvW0eztYPExNd7fPuhmE3-tw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On 18 Jan 2014 09:42, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>
>
> please define "efficient" in this context.
Would a routing device process (while forwarding for example) more IPv6
packets than IPv4?
Not a dictionary definition
>
> /bill
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 08:09:58AM +0400, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Does anyone have any experiences or insights to share on how more (or
> > less) efficient routing is with IPv6? Any specific thoughts with
respect to
> > how the following characteristics help or not with routing efficiency?
> > - fixed header size
> > - Extension header chain
> > - flow labels in header
> > - no intermediate fragmentation
> > - no checksums
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mukom Akong T.
> >
> > http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of
the
> > hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
> >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------