[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
L2TPv3/MPLS (TP) Pseudowire to preserve
- Subject: L2TPv3/MPLS (TP) Pseudowire to preserve
- From: eric at ericheather.com (Eric C. Miller)
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:29:04 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CADkMbJbKHfu3xdaSgYRXQHsQqxkKg4L=1OMc6ihoWrb_EkC+8w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADkMbJbKHfu3xdaSgYRXQHsQqxkKg4L=1OMc6ihoWrb_EkC+8w@mail.gmail.com>
Have you looked at Cisco CEF Load Sharing?
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-----Original Message-----
From: Herro91 [mailto:herro91 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 10:19 AM
To: Cisco-nsp; nanog at nanog.org; Juniper-Nsp
Subject: L2TPv3/MPLS (TP) Pseudowire to preserve
Hi,
We have a new requirement to load balance across a couple of point to point ethernet links.
The previous solution was handled by a few TDM circuits and MLPPP so that traffic was load balanced and any fragmentation/reassembly was handled by ML/PPP.
Load balancing per flow is not really an option because we have a single IPSec tunnel (ESP-mode) and there is Layer 4 information to make a better decision to balance the load.
I have been considering the use of L2TPv3 or an MPLS Pseudowire as a potential solution as they seem to have mechanisms to ensure packets are not misordered.
I would appreciate any feedback/suggestions that the community can offer.
Best,
-Doug