[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Updated ARIN allocation information
- Subject: Updated ARIN allocation information
- From: pr at isprime.com (Phil Rosenthal)
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:55:55 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLabq=CSJSv4hufv+LSJ4d2JBhLQPukDcX3gxtc6-1PZA=A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CF0EE31C.1920A%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLabq=CSJSv4hufv+LSJ4d2JBhLQPukDcX3gxtc6-1PZA=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe these weren't meant to be used outside the local ASN? :)
> I do wonder though what the purpose of this block is? If it's to be
> used inside the local ASN (as seems to be indicated based upon minimum
> allocation sizes) then why not use the IETF marked 100.64/10 space
> instead? Global-uniqueness? ok, sure...
Seems like the obvious use case is for 6to4 NAT gateways, which would mean that global reachability would be expected.
-Phil