[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?

Subject: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:30:06 +0900
In-reply-to: <CAAAwwbUzyUnC0qdTbnv5d-x2_v3aCNM1JYanqYVVh98PcQbAZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbUzyUnC0qdTbnv5d-x2_v3aCNM1JYanqYVVh98PcQbAZg@mail.gmail.com>

> So who do we ask about making IRRs expire defunct objects 

you might start with a rigorous definition of defunct

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
  - From: jared at puck.Nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
  - From: tim.h at bendtel.com (Tim Howe)

Prev by Date: Hijacking machine: ASAS201640 / AS200002
Next by Date: Route Issue Level3 to GTT - Packet loss & Latency
Previous by thread: Hijacking machine: ASAS201640 / AS200002
Next by thread: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread