[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
- Subject: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
- From: tim.h at bendtel.com (Tim Howe)
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 09:57:55 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAAAwwbUzyUnC0qdTbnv5d-x2_v3aCNM1JYanqYVVh98PcQbAZg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbUzyUnC0qdTbnv5d-x2_v3aCNM1JYanqYVVh98PcQbAZg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:51:59 -0500
Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> [snip]
> > People tend to treat things like IRR (eg: RADB, etc) as a
> > garbage pit you toss things into and never remove from.
>
> So who do we ask about making IRRs expire defunct objects and/or
> changing their system design to ensure that the legitimate resource holder
> can remove references to their prefix from ASes they no longer
> authorize to carry them,
>
> without requiring all sorts of assistance, cooperation, and
> willingness from the AS maintainer? :)
I have been asking the folks who manage the maintnr object
in question. I have so far been mostly successful. I spend varying
amounts of time explaining myself... /Sometimes/ simply pasting the
object in an email to the right person is all that is needed.
--TimH