[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]

Subject: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
From: contact at winterei.se (Paul S.)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:53:07 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Do these people never check what exactly they end up originating 
outbound due to a config change, if that's really the case?

On 11/30/2014 å??å¾? 11:24, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Leinen <simon.leinen at switch.ch> writes:
>      Simon> Some suspicious paths I'm seeing right now:
>
>      Simon>   133439 5
>      Simon>   197945 4
>
> my bet is on someone using the syntax "prepend asnX timesY" on a router
> that instead wants "prepend asnX asnX...."
>

Follow-Ups:
- Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
  - From: nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net (Joe Provo)

References:
- BGP Update Report
  - From: cidr-report at potaroo.net (cidr-report at potaroo.net)
- Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
  - From: simon.leinen at switch.ch (Simon Leinen)
- Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
  - From: pf at tippete.net (Pierfrancesco Caci)

Prev by Date: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
Next by Date: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
Previous by thread: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
Next by thread: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread