[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Interesting problems with using IPv6
- Subject: Fwd: Interesting problems with using IPv6
- From: dwcarder at wisc.edu (Dale W. Carder)
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:08:44 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Thus spake Scott Weeks (surfer at mauigateway.com) on Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 12:17:18PM -0700:
> --- fergdawgster at mykolab.com wrote:
> From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster at mykolab.com>
>
> There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6,
> especially about security and operational concerns
> about some aspects of IPv6 deployment, specifically
> regarding neighbor discovery (although there are other
> operational security concerns, as well).
>
> I'd like to provide this as an example of those
> concerns, without any additional commentary. :-)
>
> See also:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg89517.html
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I read the article and Tim Warnock on ipv6.org.au gave
> a pretty good and very brief summary. Pasted here for
> those that don't have time to read it. :-)
>
> "large L2 domain + ipv6 windows privacy extensions + some
> intel card bug + some mention of igmp snooping = multicast
> flood w/ high switch/router cpu..."
This is well known. see: draft-pashby-magma-simplify-mld-snooping-01
About 4-5 years ago there was CSCtl51859.
Vendor implementations that treat v6 neighbor discovery like it's IGMPv2
are doomed to fail.
Dale