[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
2000::/6
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>
>>> According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing
>>> "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers."
>> This problem has been solved.
>
> do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem?
I talked to folks at 3549, they had a few tickets on it that took care of that.
I know we are reviewing our â??alloc-boundaryâ?? filter to prevent such a large prefix passing again.
- Jared
- Follow-Ups:
- 2000::/6
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- References:
- 2000::/6
- From: tarko at lanparty.ee (Tarko Tikan)
- 2000::/6
- From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
- 2000::/6
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)