[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bare TLD resolutions
- Subject: Bare TLD resolutions
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:09:15 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Pursuant to
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06-en)
mentioned in the Scotland thread... it seems there are two major potential
points of possible collision:
1) User network uses "fake" TLD which is no longer fake, and local
resolver server blows it
2) User network blows it worse, and tries to resolve a monocomponent name
off non-local servers.
The latter would seem to be avoidable by making sure that *DNS resolution
of bare TLDs always returns NXDOMAIN*.
Is that a requirement for a TLD?
If it isn't, does anyone know of any domains dumb enough to actual
return something for a lookup on the bare TLD?
Is there actually *any* good reason why a lookup on a bare TLD ("com.")
might return a valid record?
And what about Naomi?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274