[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix

Subject: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:23:47 +0700
In-reply-to: <CAEs0Em+0N=aXuUc6aRhmyC9CXkJUgtO85S9AFWq3KhV9UeCaaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEs0Em+0N=aXuUc6aRhmyC9CXkJUgtO85S9AFWq3KhV9UeCaaA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Andy Litzinger <andy.litzinger.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> I appreciate any ideas!

My idea mainly centers around the operational complexity and difficulty of troubleshooting a setup of this nature.

Why not just let routing take its natural course?  Or at most, play some simple preference games which have consistent outcomes?

This kind of thing is generally far more trouble than it's worth, in my experience.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

    		   	  -- LaocoÃ¶n

Follow-Ups:
- BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

References:
- BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
  - From: andy.litzinger.lists at gmail.com (Andy Litzinger)

Prev by Date: IP Geolocation Issue
Next by Date: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
Previous by thread: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
Next by thread: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread