[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators
- Subject: Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators
- From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:38:20 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CA+zb_vFwJYUu2U_zpM57tDFQ7jeR2HjBeRZdJz1W=E-ccBRqeA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CA+zb_vFwJYUu2U_zpM57tDFQ7jeR2HjBeRZdJz1W=E-ccBRqeA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for that feedback on Googleâ??s Safe Browsing Alerts. Weâ??ll have to see how that works out for us over time.
In regards to ShadowServer, I donâ??t think theyâ??re randomly scanning networks, and neither are folks like OpenResolver â?? I think itâ??s pretty systematic, albeit from perhaps only a certain point of view on the Internet. If their scans are being dropped and logged, thatâ??s great â?? that means someone has measures in place to mitigate attacks that leverage those UDP protocols. But for those who use their output to better secure their own and clientsâ?? endpoint devices, itâ??s much appreciated. If itâ??s really just a drop in the ocean, what does it matter to you?
Frank
From: Joe [mailto:jbfixurpc at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:39 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators
I've not found it very usefull. As for Shadowserver.org I really wish folks trying to save the internet from mis-configurations would stop randomly scanning networks to fix. These folks are one of many "do-gooders" that are adding to the traffic being dropped and logged. Its only contibuting to the daily clutter of problem folk already poking and prodding.
Regards,
-Joe
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com <mailto:frnkblk at iname.com> > wrote: