No subject

[kmedcalf at dessus.com (Keith Medcalf)]

Ah.  Security hole as designed.  inline dispositions should be ignored unless the recipient specifically "requests" to see them after viewing the text/plain part.  In fact, I would vote for ignoring *everything* except the text/plain part unless the recipient specifically requests it after viewing the text/plain part.  No test/plain?  Delete without further ado.

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: Friday, 8 May, 2015 00:39
> To: Paul Ferguson
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject:
> 
> 
> In message <mailman.3786.1431050203.12477.nanog at nanog.org>, Paul Ferguson
> via N
> ANOG writes:
> >
> > Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages
> > from the list have been .eml attachments?
> 
> Nanog is encapsulating messages that are DKIM signed.  Your mailer may
> not be properly handling
> 
> 	Content-Type: message/rfc822
> 	Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org