[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks

Subject: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 19:56:28 +0700
In-reply-to: <CAJL_ZMO_T5+3RLOaFnrASTicmjtgZGjSKgBWVAbEw_rmJhsmQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOLsBOt_SOwHLZVRgb31nMMX5isiS8rkXojUpP9NyNVU05Dw9w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJL_ZMO_T5+3RLOaFnrASTicmjtgZGjSKgBWVAbEw_rmJhsmQA@mail.gmail.com>

On 25 May 2015, at 19:49, jim deleskie wrote:

> I agree, we can't even get everyone including some LARGE ( I'll avoid 
> Tier's because people get stupid around that too) networks to filter 
> customers based on assigned netblocks.

Customer of my customer [of my customer, of my customer . . . ].

It's customers all the way down.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down#History>

;>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>

References:
- [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
  - From: ramy.ihashish at gmail.com (Ramy Hashish)
- [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
  - From: kmedcalf at dessus.com (Keith Medcalf)
- [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
  - From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)

Prev by Date: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
Next by Date: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
Previous by thread: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
Next by thread: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread