[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
300+ms of hotel wifi bufferbloat - peaking at 1.5 sec!
- Subject: 300+ms of hotel wifi bufferbloat - peaking at 1.5 sec!
- From: sjt5atra at gmail.com (Steven Tardy)
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 21:25:33 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAA93jw4HYxw6F2-UNrr+WeCCQTAxBrvtc8T=dK56UzMf3WyKfQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAA93jw4HYxw6F2-UNrr+WeCCQTAxBrvtc8T=dK56UzMf3WyKfQ@mail.gmail.com>
There's a corollary of the bufferbloat phenomenon: buffer drain time. It's not the size of the buffer, but how long it takes to empty. And US ISPs continue to say "customers don't want upload speed".
If the ISP upload speed was symmetric you'd likely never notice the 1-2MB of buffers.
I guess what I'm getting at is why do you continue to say buffers are too big instead of saying ISP upload is too slow?
> On May 30, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/578850
>
> I would get a kick out of it if folk here tried this new speedtest
> periodically (on the "cable" setting) during the nanog conference. ;)
> There is a hires option for more detail on the resulting charts...
>
> (or fiddled with "flent" (flent.org))
>
> --
> Dave T?ht
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast