Dear Windstream engineers

[joelja at bogus.com (joel jaeggli)]

On 1/30/16 2:29 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman wrote:
> You offer this service to your customers, don?t you?   ;-)

source based RTBH requires urpf, which while generally available may
have practical limitations on implementation.

> Seriously, it?s a good question.  Most IP transit providers offering BGP services do offer RTBH.
> 
>> On Jan 29, 2016, at 10:51 PM, George Skorup <george at cbcast.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why doesn't Windstream have RTBH for their BGP customers? It cannot be impossible to implement.
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160131/b32b6d4f/attachment.pgp>