[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

Subject: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:54:16 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAB2RJyjCqH2bXp5N8NUNwUG9KSwww6MQUGBz2UVxhf2v7QF0jg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> Todd Underwood wrote:
> > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?
>
> are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?
>
> Nick
>
> > T
> > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred at web2objects.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Anyone else aware of it?
> >>
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
  - From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)

References:
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
  - From: fred at web2objects.com (Fred Hollis)
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
  - From: toddunder at gmail.com (Todd Underwood)
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
Next by Date: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
Previous by thread: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
Next by thread: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread