[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon Fios, WashDC gateway problem
- Subject: Verizon Fios, WashDC gateway problem
- From: shocksofmighty at gmail.com (Paul Paukstelis)
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:35:07 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAKnNFz_OAoUO9tSm-BqqehKDKU6RcD2-AdO6xnu0JPd9ndF8_g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAKnNFz_OAoUO9tSm-BqqehKDKU6RcD2-AdO6xnu0JPd9ndF8_g@mail.gmail.com>
I avoided posting traceroute initially after reading the FAQ, but this
seems like a case where it can help in diagnostics. Loss starts at the
affected device (hop 3) and persists. See mtr report for affected and
unaffected gateways:
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best
Wrst StDev
1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home 0.0% 673 0.5 0.5
0.4 0.6 0.0
2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-123.verizon-gni.net 0.0% 673 6.5 8.1
3.7 90.1 9.6
3. G1-7-3-5.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net 11.2% 673 8.2 8.7
5.1 15.8 1.6
4. ???
5. 0.ae4.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET 10.4% 673 9.0 8.0
5.4 22.1 1.4
6. be3018.ccr41.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com 10.3% 673 7.1 8.2
5.9 15.3 1.2
7. 38.122.63.54 12.3% 673 7.0 8.4
6.2 29.3 2.8
8. ae3-asbnvacyj41.lightower.net 9.4% 672 7.1 8.3
5.8 32.0 2.2
9. 172.85.52.94.lightower.net 10.7% 672 10.0 9.6
7.5 14.3 1.0
10. te1-4.css-fw-r1.net.umd.edu 11.0% 672 12.2 14.8 7.6
287.2 27.2
11. gi6-6.ptx-core-r1.net.umd.edu 7.9% 672 10.5 11.0 7.8
340.5 15.2
12. gi3-2.ptx-dual-r1.net.umd.edu 9.7% 672 11.9 13.1 8.3
265.6 14.3
13. 129.2.168.3 12.6% 672 11.2 10.9 8.5
188.4 7.7
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best
Wrst StDev
1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home 0.0% 287 0.5 0.5
0.5 1.2 0.1
2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-123.verizon-gni.net 0.0% 287 6.6 14.9
3.7 148.3 22.8
3. G0-10-3-4.WASHDC-LCR-21.verizon-gni.ne 0.0% 287 9.4 14.9
5.3 97.2 19.1
4. ???
5. 0.ae3.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET 0.0% 287 7.8 13.6
5.7 93.6 17.7
6. be3018.ccr41.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com 0.0% 287 8.1 14.0
6.0 94.1 18.5
7. 38.122.63.54 0.0% 287 9.7 15.5
6.0 97.1 19.1
8. ae3-asbnvacyj41.lightower.net 0.0% 287 9.4 16.4
5.9 95.7 19.6
9. 172.85.52.94.lightower.net 0.0% 287 9.1 19.0
7.7 99.7 22.6
10. te1-4.css-fw-r1.net.umd.edu 0.0% 287 9.4 23.9 7.7
269.8 35.7
11. gi6-6.ptx-core-r1.net.umd.edu 0.0% 287 10.7 18.2 8.2
100.4 20.6
12. gi3-2.ptx-dual-r1.net.umd.edu 0.0% 287 12.2 20.5 8.5
172.2 23.7
13. 129.2.168.2 0.0% 287 11.1 16.4
7.7 95.8 19.3
On 02/17/2016 02:14 PM, chris wrote:
> packet loss in the middle of the path means nothing if you have no
> loss at the destination. do you see packet loss on the last mtr hop
> which is your destination machine?
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Paul Paukstelis
> <shocksofmighty at gmail.com <mailto:shocksofmighty at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Apologies for a post as a non-expert, but it was suggested that I
> see if any Verizon techs are reading here and to solicit opinions
> on fixing a peculiar problem.
>
> I noticed about a month ago that all upload traffic from my home
> router (Fios) to a specific work machine was extremely slow. I
> first thought it was an issue with the destination NIC, or
> something with the university gateway. I had normal upload speeds
> to other destination machines in the same building on the same
> subnet, etc. Eventually, I swapped IPs on the two machines, and
> found that the problem had to do with routing to a specific IP,
> not the destination machine itself. I confirmed first with
> wireshark that there was packet loss resulting in constant TCP
> Fast Retransmits when uploading to the affected host IP.
> traceroute showed that the affected and unaffected traffic went
> through different Verizon gateways
> (G1-7-3-5.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net
> <http://G1-7-3-5.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net> and
> G0-10-3-4.WASHDC-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net
> <http://G0-10-3-4.WASHDC-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net>, respectively;
> I've ultimately found that four different gateways are used
> depending on the destination IP). mtr confirmed consistent 10%
> packet loss at G1-7-3-5.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net
> <http://G1-7-3-5.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net>. This tells me
> that there is clearly a problem with this device, but I have yet
> to be able to convince Verizon there is a problem. I thought I
> might just VPN around it, but as luck would have it the university
> VPN IP gets routed through the bad gateway. This has to be
> impacting a significant number of Fios customers in the DC/MD
> area. 25% of all upload traffic (assuming a normal distribution of
> destination IPs) gets routed through this bad device.
>
> Any thoughts on how to get in touch with someone from Verizon that
> can help with this or any specific ideas on what this problem
> might be which I can try to pass along?
>
> Thanks.
>
>