[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960

Subject: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:55:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAMDdSzMJT4DdXjq68xXyQmBJRHn2rj-JkkYLAJUXu1yzuqj1CQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> In other words, "hitless" does not mean "not service impacting".

I would assume any SMU impacts traffic and requires a reboot or a line card reset.  There are types of SMUs that touch low level parts and require a reboot, in which case I?ve often told Cisco they should just rev the release number.

Solving SMU dependencies is sometimes impossible.  Right now the 5.3.3 SMU set posted on CCO can?t be installed with any of their automation/tools.  We are waiting for Cisco to provide a fix.  I?m not holding my breath.

- Jared

References:
- Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
  - From: colton.conor at gmail.com (Colton Conor)
- Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
  - From: jason at rice.edu (Jason Bothe)
- Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
Next by Date: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
Previous by thread: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
Next by thread: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread