[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cogent & Google IPv6

Subject: Cogent & Google IPv6
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:18:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <1906151786.11094.1456345593687.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:51:55 -0500, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> Or do you think Cogent is paying all of them? That is a possibility, but it
> means that Cogent is not getting paid - by definition.

All depends how creative their accountants are... :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160224/e0e1bac3/attachment.pgp>

References:
- Cogent & Google IPv6
  - From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Cogent & Google IPv6
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Cogent & Google IPv6
  - From: jfbeam at gmail.com (Ricky Beam)
- Cogent & Google IPv6
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)

Prev by Date: Cogent & Google IPv6
Next by Date: Standard terminology for a dark fiber path?
Previous by thread: Cogent & Google IPv6
Next by thread: Cogent & Google IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread