[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Thank you, Comcast.

Subject: Thank you, Comcast.
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:50:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:52:55 -0500, Jay Nugent said:

>     However, if a 'provider' wishes to block ANYTHING, then they need to
> inform the customer IN WRITING exactly what will be blocked so that
> customer doesn't waste their time and money with said (limited) service
> and vote with their wallet by buying *real* Internet service, elsewhere.

Which is only an option in those rare places where there's actual real
competition.  In most places, it's a monopoly, or a non-functional
duopoly (Let's face it - how many users will protest a 10M cable connection
with 4 ports punched out by moving to 768K DSL?)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160226/0b4c931b/attachment.pgp>

References:
- Thank you, Comcast.
  - From: kmedcalf at dessus.com (Keith Medcalf)
- Thank you, Comcast.
  - From: jjn at nuge.com (Jay Nugent)

Prev by Date: Thank you, Comcast.
Next by Date: Thank you, Comcast.
Previous by thread: Thank you, Comcast.
Next by thread: Thank you, Comcast.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread