[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
- Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:54:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfaadffxOtaPx9yuNCcBgRyTNzKdjjEb7Nur2r_jkCwQMA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAFXuDfaEN1CBDES80631j-+3-SXVV2BScNEUjUe=s2mQ6taOqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfa0QuinWV7E2FQCLmweXMG5CbN7Ad80ubcZnmR1bh_7LQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaadffxOtaPx9yuNCcBgRyTNzKdjjEb7Nur2r_jkCwQMA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/Feb/16 23:41, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Newer, more expensive, more bugs. 4500 is cheap on the secondary market.
The EX4600 is actually just a shy cheaper than the EX4550. We are
looking at it not because the EX4550 is a bad box, but because Juniper
are focusing development on the EX4600 instead (much like Cisco are
doing between the ME3600X and ASR920).
You lose 8x ports on the EX4600, though, if coming from the EX4550. May
or may not be an issue for you.
I wouldn't look at the EX4500. Too big and old now.
Mark.