[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

Subject: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: todd.crane at n5tech.com (Todd Crane)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:06:34 -0700

This maybe outside the scope of this list but I was wondering if anybody had advice or lessons learned on the whole sFlow vs netFlow debate. We are looking at using it for billing and influencing our sdn flows. It seems like everything I have found is biased (articles by companies who have commercial offerings for the "better" protocol)

Todd Crane

Follow-Ups:
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: bedard.phil at gmail.com (Phil Bedard)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: freedman at freedman.net (Avi Freedman)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)

Prev by Date: Packet loss on XO's network
Next by Date: mrtg alternative
Previous by thread: Packet loss on XO's network
Next by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread