[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP
- Subject: Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP
- From: bms at fastmail.net (Bruce Simpson)
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 08:21:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 13/05/16 20:39, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> In 2012, nearly three years before being recruited for NTPsec, I
> solved this problem as part of my work on GPSD. The key to this
> solution is an obscure feature of USB, and a one-wire
> patch to the bog-standard design for generic USB that exploits
> it. Technical details on request, but what it comes down to is
> that with this one weird trick(!) you can mass-produce primary time
> sources with a jitter bounded by the USB polling interval for
> about $20 a pop.
>
> The USB 1 polling interval is 1ms.
What about USB 3.1 (assuming the device is not intended to be backwards
compatible with the polling model) ? I should point out Intel intend to
retire EHCI/UHCI and implement only xHCI.