[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP
- Subject: Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP
- From: lowen at pari.edu (Lamar Owen)
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:16:13 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 05/15/2016 03:16 PM, M?ns Nilsson wrote:
> ...If you think the IP implementations in IoT devices are na?ve, wait
> until you've seen what passes for broadcast quality network
> engineering. Shoving digital audio samples in raw Ethernet frames is
> at least 20 years old, but the last perhaps 5 years has seen some
> progress in actually using IP to carry audio streams. (this is
> close-to-realtime audio, not file transfers, btw.)
Close to realtime is a true statement. Using an IP STL
(studio-transmitter link) has enough latency that the announcer can no
longer use the air signal as a monitor.
And the security side of things is a pretty serious issue; just ask a
major IP STL appliance vendor about the recent hijacking of some of
their customers' IP STL devices.... yeah, a random intruder on the
internet hijacked several radio stations' IP STL's and began
broadcasting their content over the radio. Not pretty. I advise any of
my remaining broadcast clients that if they are going to an IP STL that
they put in a dedicated point to point IP link without publicly routable
IP addresses.
Digital audio for broadcast STL's is old tech; we were doing G.722/G.723
over switched-56 in the early 90's. But using a public-facing internet
connection with no firewalling for an IP STL appliance like the Barix
boxes and the Tieline boxes and similar? That borders on networking
malpractice.
> ... But, to try to return to "relevant for NANOG", there are actual
> products requiring microsecond precision being sold. And used. And
> we've found that those products don't have a very good holdover. ...
Television broadcast is another excellent example of timing needs; thanks.
Valdis mentioned the scariest thing.... the scariest thing I've seen
recently? Windows NT 3.5 being used for a transmitter control system,
within the past five years. I will agree with Valdis on the scary
aspects of the public safety communications Mel mentioned. Thanks, Mel,
for the educational post.