[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.

Subject: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
From: mkamal at noor.net (Mohamed Kamal)
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:46:42 +0200 (EET)
In-reply-to: <6D526C4EE4FA2745AD0D768DC25211F008FE546E5264@MBOX-CLUSTER.hosted.vorboss.net>
References: <[email protected]> <6D526C4EE4FA2745AD0D768DC25211F008FE546E5264@MBOX-CLUSTER.hosted.vorboss.net>

tried this Timothy, and the RSVP didn't appear in the inet.3. Failed to work!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy Creswick" <Timothy.Creswick at vorboss.com>
To: "Mohamed Kamal" <mkamal at noor.net>, nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:30:08 PM
Subject: RE: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.

> I have increased the preference of the RSVP, and it has been taken out of the inet.3, so the l2circuit didn't prefer
> the RSVP path anymore!

Just add "no-install-to-address" to the LSP.

Follow-Ups:
- MPLS Reference Designs
  - From: ahebert at pubnix.net (Alain Hebert)
- Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)

References:
- Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
  - From: mkamal at noor.net (Mohamed Kamal)
- Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
  - From: Timothy.Creswick at vorboss.com (Timothy Creswick)

Prev by Date: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
Next by Date: LLDP via SNMP
Previous by thread: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit.
Next by thread: MPLS Reference Designs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread