[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:39:30 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaR43LSW2YPBK3GQR4g057rO85WMQaHKkpJftt0M-7PiQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaJYGQmJqfcC+mT5RF=KmOiX69gQEqTDQFYGkRf4G=4sQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On 10/Nov/16 21:23, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> I think people were looking for specifics about the implementation
> deficits in the junos version which caused enough problems to justify
> the term "not getting it"?
The only IS-IS implementation we struggle with is Quagga.
For that, we run OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 on Quagga and redistribute that into
the IS-IS core.
Use-case is Anycast (DNS, NTP, TACACS+, e.t.c.) on FreeBSD.
Mark.