[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- Subject: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:53:28 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfZ+70ZJyJ6ZN_tzTJBbCfniEm36jzejsEKvoaP9Szm8vg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAC6=tfaYDaLLSHWcSg1ybkEB_CKVvtDrpShCSzPjDVFcQbhimw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaJYGQmJqfcC+mT5RF=KmOiX69gQEqTDQFYGkRf4G=4sQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfZPzGtQ3+11ZCiD29A9eiQeFwrY7OY+MhqHfqUYvZgqeg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfYGxdVkzY33CVi6A8xigW5Zmyyg0AqX=NLtuK5E6vBAGg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfZyn1zVsfgma+N2a11qV-mx=ZKQ3qc0RrimCCC-1+R1DA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaFn-6Y=pvhTL8eWWmwd3dBEzV6F1EyuAbvfYxrGMWXeA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaGoB4ePWJ6pQNVCPi3djyF0oYnv4CyUZkAvaJwJmYM1g@mail.gmail.com> <CABD6Mzs51K5sT9o8sG1qwBivUq4wrtdSf8RcuaaKrykTVkTx9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfZzvO3uc0Jacjb1-v_b=qa+bnHK5cF9d4uy3bFP_5feZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK19Y1fPH9Jv+HEWvuFRnuvXYDWGC3oHQNfX_9hEf5Ay=zkzzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC6=tfZ+70ZJyJ6ZN_tzTJBbCfniEm36jzejsEKvoaP9Szm8vg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/Nov/16 02:53, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Here's a start!
>
> "Support for OSPFv3 and IS-IS is various beta states currently; IS-IS for
> IPv4 is believed to be usable while OSPFv3 and IS-IS for IPv6 have known
> issues."
Such as?
Mark.