[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CGNAT
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 20:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> > BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
> > load of CGNAT?
>
> Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual
> stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.
My data on customers supposed to be 100% dual-stack (unless they
explicitely disable IPv6 on their side, which some of them do) says 25%
on best days. It used to be up to 35% in late 2015.
For reason unknown, it was going slightly down during 2016, with a
sudden extra decrease in january this year.
- Follow-Ups:
- CGNAT
- From: achatz at forthnet.gr (Tassos Chatzithomaoglou)
- References:
- CGNAT
- From: ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net (Ahmed Munaf)
- CGNAT
- From: aaron1 at gvtc.com (Aaron Gould)
- CGNAT
- From: maxtul at netassist.ua (Max Tulyev)
- CGNAT
- From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)