[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cisco ISE

Subject: Cisco ISE
From: cjwolff at nola.gov (Christopher J. Wolff)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 20:53:32 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

Proceed with extreme caution.  You may want to have that end of life ACS deployment bake for another six months.  You will want to have the highest level of Cisco engineering engaged should you choose to go this direction.

On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Mann, Jason <jamann at mt.gov<mailto:jamann at mt.gov>> wrote:

As would I. We are going to start a project that is replacing ACS 5.7 with ISE 2.X

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher J. Wolff
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 2:41 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Cisco ISE

Is anyone successfully deploying ISE 2.X?  Iâ??m six months into it on about 10,000 endpoints and it seems like itâ??s a highly challenged product.  Iâ??d love to hear your experiences on or off-list.  Thanks in advance.

Follow-Ups:
- Cisco ISE
  - From: synack at live.com (Darin Herteen)

References:
- Cisco ISE
  - From: cjwolff at nola.gov (Christopher J. Wolff)
- Cisco ISE
  - From: jamann at mt.gov (Mann, Jason)

Prev by Date: Cisco ISE
Next by Date: Cisco ISE
Previous by thread: Cisco ISE
Next by thread: Cisco ISE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread