[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IOS new versions and network load
- Subject: IOS new versions and network load
- From: paul at paulstewart.org (Paul Stewart)
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:47:10 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAHf3uWxoFNXx7-6xComzPLohbzPw6SkLsO34AXSKi8KhXxZR7Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Apple does use CDNâ??s and does peer quite a bit as well.. What I have seen is our peering with Apple goes to a certain level of bandwidth and then spills over to CDNâ??s that we are either peered with or have on-net caches. From our network perspective itâ??s simply a matter of ensuring there is enough capacit on the peering links and/or cache capacity. If both of those options are exceeded then upstream transit starts to fill in the gap (only seen that happen once).
Paul
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 7:34 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca> wrote:
>
> On 2017-09-17 18:41, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>> https://www.peeringdb.com/net/3554
>
> Peering would reduce an ISP's reliance on transit provider (and thus
> load on transit providers) hut still present same problem on the ISP's
> internal network.
>
> Also, doesn't Apple use a CDN such as Akamai or L3 to deliver content
> like that?
>
>> "We do have another option to consider -
>> http://www.apple.com/osx/server/features/#caching-server"
>
> Considering Apple has been out of the server business since 2010, Would
> ISPs really bother installing/configuring (and finding a spot on a rack
> shelf ) for a Mac Mini only to reduce load once a year ?
>