[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
- Subject: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:42:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAAGLZPFr7YTf-mzhmBFRwKswxGZMhH7sj==14ioCH+Hb78_Mbg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAGLZPFc_BBQ6e-Y-JLun=fBMyOr-yA4fAm7k4yWfdERGRRqdA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
There are several ISPs doing trials (thousands of users).
RFC6877 (464XLAT), section 4. Network Architecture, indicates clearly â??Wireline Network Architecture can be used in situations where there
are clients behind the CLAT, regardless of the type of access service
-- for example, fiber to the home (FTTH), Data Over Cable Service
Interface Specification (DOCSIS), or WiFi.â??
Vendors confirmed two weeks ago they have implementations in CEs.
RFC7084 was created before all the new transition technologies (including 464XLAT and MAP, for example, or even lw4o6 that has many advantages compared to DS-LITE, being the same but requiring a much simpler CGN), so thatâ??s why Iâ??m working to update it (most probably as an â??accompanying documentâ?? only for the transition part:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition
New versions to be publish this week hopefully â?¦
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
Organización: People's Front Against WWW
Responder a: <swmike at swm.pp.se>
Fecha: sábado, 23 de septiembre de 2017, 13:22
Para: Fredrik Sallinen <fredrik.sallinen at gmail.com>
CC: <nanog at nanog.org>
Asunto: Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Fredrik Sallinen wrote:
> Please correct me If I'm wrong, AFAIK 464XLAT works best with mobile
> networks and its not suitable for fixed broadband. right?
It's most widely deployed in mobile networks, yes. There is nothing that
says it couldn't work anywhere else.
However, in fixed networks with PPPoE the most commonly used model is dual
stack with RFC7084 style routers.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.