[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS
- Subject: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS
- From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:25:36 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAOvEG7PzGcfYdHEo4uTOYWj6W9af4=Fkc_GWPt+gc7G9ohebSA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAOvEG7OEOac+KfbsqsJBL1VU_4eKbWgb-49O3tgBALH5bEawKg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOvEG7PzGcfYdHEo4uTOYWj6W9af4=Fkc_GWPt+gc7G9ohebSA@mail.gmail.com>
Would you mind sharing the solution(s)? I've stiched a L2 PW using lt-interfaces.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:51:36AM -0500, Ben Bartsch wrote:
> I want to thank everyone who contacted me on and off list on this request.
> I now have two methods to land a layer 3 endpoint on a layer 2 circuit to a
> remote PE. I very much appreciate the input, feedback, and assistance. I
> hope I personally get to meet all of you that reached out to me at a future
> NANOG meeting. Thanks again!
>
> -ben
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2
> > pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI. I'm trying to do
> > the same thing on a Juniper MX 480/960 and it does not appear to be
> > supported (for LDP at least - MP-BGP might be supported). We could do
> > either VPWS or VPLS on the PE device handoff to the CE (layer 2 only).
> > JTAC has somewhat confirmed this is not supported for LDP, but they only do
> > break/fix, not new config. We do not have professional services (we are
> > broke).
> >
> > Any Juniper routerheads out there that have seen this done using LDP
> > without having to hairpin on the MX?
> >
> > Thanks, y'all.
> >
> > -ben