[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Yet another Quadruple DNS?
- Subject: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
- From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:17:15 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAMCxY-H7xzwp+9OeCD=ooh4Qd5mc=h65wj1qu0cOZRq7AYAc5g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAMCxY-H7xzwp+9OeCD=ooh4Qd5mc=h65wj1qu0cOZRq7AYAc5g@mail.gmail.com>
> On Mar 28, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Michael Crapse <michael at wi-fiber.io> wrote:
>
> Many providers filter out 1.1.1.1 because too many people use it in their
> examples/test code. I doubt that it's a usable IP/service.
Thereâ??s at least one vendor *cough* cisco *cough* that has used it as
captive portal IP.
Iâ??m not sure I would try to use it on a client machine because you donâ??t
know if youâ??ll reach the internet.
If you know youâ??re not on a closed network, you could use it instead of
the list of usual suspects, like 8.8.8.8 4.2.2.1 9.9.9.9 etc.
- Jared