[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Qu??bec Sales tax
bell canada?
/kc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:45:26PM -0400, Alain Hebert said:
>?????? Same deal as Paypal and EBay.
>
>?????? Netflix dropping their services in CDN/QC only serve <Yuo know who>
>attempt at making yet another market grab.
>
>
>?????? At the end Netflix may just charge the Tax and funnel it to the
>govt.?? They'll still be making a bundle.
>
>?????? ?????? ( And with all the hardware already deployed locally at the
>many exchanges ... )
>
>
>?????? Now if we can only break that damn 1930's licensing scheme so that
>we can gain access to more content...?? Kinda annoyed that <You know who>
>is hogging all the content with their vertical licensing agreements.
>
>-----
>Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
>PubNIX Inc.
>50 boul. St-Charles
>P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
>Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
>
>On 03/27/18 18:21, Ken Chase wrote:
>>If Netflix has no physical presence in Quebec, what the lever are they going
>>to use to force this? A lawsuit in <state of netflix incorporation> in the
>>US? What court is going to entertain a foreign jurisdiction's tax claim in
>>their court? And how would that be then enforced?
>>
>>Canada has tried this before:
>>
>>https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/u-s-judge-puts-halt-to-canadian-court-order-for-google-to-delist-search-results-1.3663055
>>
>>Court file: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16701/index.do
>>
>>Im a big fan of Canada standing up for its sovereignty (I live here), but nice
>>try.
>>
>>/kc
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:10:51PM -0400, Jean-Francois Mezei said:
>> >Not quite networking but probably relevant.
>> >
>> >The Canadian province of Qu??bec just introduced a new budget with
>> >basically the intent to force foreign digital companies who sell
>> >services to Qu??bekers to collect the local value added sales tax and
>> >remit those to the QC government.
>> >
>> >The goal is to capture tax from Netflix who has so far escaped taxation
>> >in Canada by having no legal/physical presence in Canada, no cache
>> >servers of its own etc. Netflix does not currently collect province
>> >information from customers (or any address info for that matter).
>> >
>> >They based many of their arguments on an OECD study (which ironically
>> >the Canadian federal government says is not completed yet (as excuse for
>> >not proceeding with similar tax).
>> >
>> >So foreign digital services will be required to require subscibers enter
>> >AND VALIDATE their address so that they have an accurate province field
>> >(validation remains to be finalized), and IF they sell more than $30,000
>> >to Qu??bec residents, will be required to self register with QC
>> >government to collect local sales tax (and remit to QC government).
>> >
>> >The Qu??bec budget expects that validation of address will be based on IP
>> >address geolocation or custoemrs send paper bills to prove place of
>> >residence.
>> >
>> >(Although requiring full address/phone number and sendint this to credit
>> >card network for authorization might constitute a better means to
>> >validate address).
>> >
>> >I suspect the big winners will be VPN services in the USA :-)
>> >
>> >Because many ISPs span multiple provinces, IP geolocation generally
>> >points to their HQ address, not necessarily the province of the
>> >subscriber. (This is especially true for DSL in bell Canada wholesale
>> >where currently a single point of connection between Bell and ISP allows
>> >full reach of all of its DSL territory in QC/ON. For Cable, ISPs require
>> >different IP pools for Rogers in Ontario and Vid??otron in Ontario (with
>> >a couple of exceptions where Vid??otron has service in a couple fo
>> >Ontario towns). In Western Canada, things are harder as Shaw serves BC,
>> >AB, SASK and MB.
>>
>>--
>>Ken Chase - math at sizone.org Guelph Canada
>>
>
--
Ken Chase - math at sizone.org Guelph Canada