[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Yet another Quadruple DNS?
- Subject: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
- From: bortzmeyer at nic.fr (Stephane Bortzmeyer)
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:55:26 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CA+E3k91ieN050+MWBzDGiz-kR41pu=Y58BH_p1wE_exBaqi9Uw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <20180329T131245Z@localhost> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaY5qYGg0ZHrGdsQ8RBYNf=Knxj5osugGTPyW6OfC3eQyA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+E3k90OkfN6tr+fh=T0pPTavizERM5pb1cFq8wsDkscBVyiZA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+E3k91ieN050+MWBzDGiz-kR41pu=Y58BH_p1wE_exBaqi9Uw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 06:46:19AM -0800,
Royce Williams <royce at techsolvency.com> wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> Full survey - with owners of the largest bit-boundary-aligned blocks
> that contain them - here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/roycewilliams/6cb91ed94b88730321ca3076006229f1
Unlike what you say, 112.112.112.112 works (note for the
humour-impaired: there is a trick):
% dig @112.112.112.112 facebook.com
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> @112.112.112.112 facebook.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41543
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;facebook.com. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
facebook.com. 126 IN A 31.13.74.1
;; Query time: 218 msec
;; SERVER: 112.112.112.112#53(112.112.112.112)
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 30 16:54:12 CEST 2018
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 57