[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
- Subject: MAP-E
- From: brian at interlinx.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 09:48:06 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPkb-7A2Ye=mUkYwZuVQkyDN3hFE=rTx6Ap8pb5u_SDwe83nYQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 15:37 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
wrote:
> Ask the vendor to support RFC8585.
>
>
>
> Also, you can do it with OpenWRT.
>
>
>
> I think 464XLAT is a better option and both of them are supported by
> OpenWRT.
>
>
>
> You can also use OpenSource (Jool) for the NAT64.
Will any of these (including MAP-E) support such nasty (in terms of
burying IP addresses in data payloads) protocols as FTP and SIP/SDP?
Cheers,
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190802/f05936db/attachment.sig>
- Follow-Ups:
- MAP-E
- From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- MAP-E
- From: aled.w.morris at googlemail.com (Aled Morris)
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)