[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
- Subject: MAP-E
- From: jayhanke at gmail.com (Jay Hanke)
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:55:02 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPkb-7A2Ye=mUkYwZuVQkyDN3hFE=rTx6Ap8pb5u_SDwe83nYQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BD0kbJqd5+uSrS14iOVTE-d=WkiKpAKa+3RRAAvky40Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAK6zc0=W+jOweLsC5vS8Kcuz58HuTkC5DWrJjJD16y5kX3GFQg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
> I can't think of a public presentation off the top of my head that
> explains how each major transition technology works, and the pros and
> cons of each. There must be one, but it's hard to cover the major
> options in an hour.
Actually your post is better than a presentation. I was quite
surprised at the adoption rate of DS-Lite. There must be some pretty
decent B4 implementations with that many operators deployed.
Even though the spreadsheet is small sample size, there isn't much
DS-lite deployment in the US.
So from 10k feet, MAP-E is basically the same thing as DS-Lite except
for the location of the NAT?
- Follow-Ups:
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: jayhanke at gmail.com (Jay Hanke)
- MAP-E
- From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard)