[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
- Subject: MAP-E
- From: lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:47:57 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPkb-7A2Ye=mUkYwZuVQkyDN3hFE=rTx6Ap8pb5u_SDwe83nYQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BD0kbJqd5+uSrS14iOVTE-d=WkiKpAKa+3RRAAvky40Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAK6zc0=W+jOweLsC5vS8Kcuz58HuTkC5DWrJjJD16y5kX3GFQg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 8/8/19 9:00 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> As for protocol, assuming port mapping on UPnP gateway is statically
> configured by ISPs not changable from CPE side, GetListOfPortMappings()
> of UPnP should be useful for CPEs to know range of ports to be used
> by them.
There's actually a DHCPv6 option for specifying the port information in
addition to the transition tech in use. I had previously inquired to
NANOG about it, though I don't recall the specifics at this time.
In theory, with that in place, a user could go buy any ol' RG style
router with support for the proper transition tech and just plug and
play like they currently do with native dual-stack networks.
--
Brandon Martin
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: jayhanke at gmail.com (Jay Hanke)
- MAP-E
- From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard)
- MAP-E
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)