[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Subject: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
From: egon at egon.cc (James Downs)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:42:05 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAOEezJQiEVu1vToFQr_hKbKCBDcnHC0jDgP+V+Cfu+mt1uNahg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On Feb 17, 2019, at 19:26, valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

> I was thinking more of the guy who was convinced that each octet in an IPV4
> address could store 0 through 256.

That's what the overflow flag is for, right?

References:
- A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
  - From: giri at dombox.org (Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan)
- A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
  - From: michel.py at tsisemi.com (Michel Py)
- A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
  - From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
Next by Date: TATA/AS6453 BGP communities
Previous by thread: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
Next by thread: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread